CATHOLICS AND OTHER ANTI ZIONISTS ACCUSE EVANGELICALS OF “SIN OF DISUNITY”

[Rebbetzin]

Hi everyone,

Well, isn’t this just a joke.  The very ones spreading disunity are accusing the Evangelical Christian Zionists of spreading disunity by being Zionists in the first place. Of course, they would say such a thing, it’s very damaging of the Christian Zionists to undermine these “superior” (in their own minds) church leaders in their belief that the Jews have no right to their God given land. It also undermines their view that the Jews are finished in God’s scheme of all things pertaining to salvation and according to them, do not deserve the Holy Land. To them, God has trampled on His promises to the Jewish nation and has kicked them to the side in His plans of a total restoration of HIS creation.  They couldn’t be further strayed from the truth if they tried harder.

Supercessionism or replacement theology teaches over centuries that the church, as a whole has replaced the Jewish people in the game of salvation, and is a diabolical lie perpetrated by the Roman Catholic Church and some of her daughters. That the promises in Scripture for Israel have been “done away with”, that YeHoVaH is only now interested in Christians who believe this lie. In their minds it is the truth and they’ll go down fighting for this false narrative to their dying breaths it seems.

Replacement theology, by all accounts if we understand Biblical prophecy well enough, has to be vetoed completely before Antichrist is revealed to the world. Think about it.

In actual fact, it seems to me that Christian Zionists are restoring Universal Salvation as the truth, by default. The old erroneous beliefs have to be completely jettisoned. This is why we here at the BRI/IMCF even exist. Jewish thought form and first century understanding of the nature of YeHoVaH’s salvation to the entire world has been harpooned centuries ago by a false doctrine, one that has seen so much persecution and bloodshed against the Jews for the most part of two millennia. The fact that the Roman Catholic Church and her daughters are still pushing this point and their diabolical agenda in this regard, proves that their doctrines are in jeopardy. And, I guess, if you’re them, that can’t happen. So, they’ve come out to slam their Christian counterparts in their love of the Jewish people and their support of them returning to their homeland.  Their YeHoVaH given Land.

Please have a read of the next three articles to get a complete grasp of just what these haters of the Jewish people believe about them and us as Christian Zionists and what can only be interpreted by us all as their illogical conclusion when you read their comments.

To see pictures and to access the full letter of condemnation mentioned in the articles below, please access all links.

“Church condemns Christian Zionism as “damaging ideology” that threatens Church unity.
“By ADAM ELIYAHU BERKOWITZ

“CHRISTIAN ZIONISM
“JANUARY 19, 2026

https://israel365news.com/415473/catholic-church-condemns-christian-zionism-as-damaging-ideology-that-threatens-church-unity/?vgo_ee=DtsGij6CrTRC6I9iL2XnIdLAIFLD71%2BIwq%2BoCv1KFn1%2FRC1k%3AFoTb4FBotKIlOZYTHf2CUgfqboRtAJMF

“The Catholic Church and its allied denominations in Jerusalem just declared war on Christian Zionism. In a statement released January 17, the Patriarchs and Heads of Churches in the Holy Land—led by the Roman Catholic hierarchy along with Eastern Catholic, Orthodox, and other traditional church leaders—condemned Christian support for Israel as a “damaging ideology” that misleads the public and harms Christian unity. The statement represents the Catholic Church’s most direct assault yet on the millions of evangelical Christians whose biblical interpretation leads them to support the Jewish state.

“The Catholic-led coalition opened with a bold assertion of ecclesiastical authority: “The Patriarchs and Heads of Churches in the Holy Land affirm before the faithful and before the world that the flock of Christ in this land is entrusted to the Apostolic Churches, which have borne their sacred ministry across centuries with steadfast devotion.”

“Then came the condemnation: “Recent activities undertaken by local individuals who advance damaging ideologies, such as Christian Zionism, mislead the public, sow confusion, and harm the unity of our flock. These undertakings have found favor among certain political actors in Israel and beyond who seek to push a political agenda which may harm the Christian presence in the Holy Land and the wider Middle East.”

“The statement invoked New Testament authority to attack Christian Zionists: “Holy Scripture teaches us that ‘we, though many, are one body in Christ, and individually members one of another’ (Romans 12:5). To claim authority outside the communion of the Church is to wound the unity of the faithful and burden the pastoral mission entrusted to the historic churches in the very land where our Lord lived, taught, suffered, and rose from the dead.”

“The Catholic-led coalition then accused Israel of interference: “The Patriarchs and Heads of Churches further note with concern that these individuals have been welcomed at official levels both locally and internationally. Such actions constitute interference in the internal life of the churches and disregard the pastoral responsibility vested in the Patriarchs and Heads of Churches in Jerusalem.”

“Their territorial claim was unambiguous: “The Patriarchs and Heads of Churches in Jerusalem reiterate that they alone represent the Churches and their flock in matters pertaining to Christian religious, communal, and pastoral life in the Holy Land.”

“The historical irony is staggering. The Catholic Church, which developed and enforced replacement theology—Supersessionism in Latin—for nearly two millennia, now condemns Christians who reject that very theology. The institution that declared Jews collectively guilty of deicide, that forced Jews into ghettos, that presided over expulsions and forced conversions, now objects to Christians who read their Bibles and conclude that God’s covenant with Israel remains intact.

“The Bible speaks directly to this issue: “And I will bless them that bless thee, and him that curseth thee will I curse; and in thee shall all the families of the earth be blessed” (Genesis 12:3). The Catholic hierarchy is demanding that Israel reject those who bless her and grant exclusive recognition to institutions whose theological foundation for centuries was that the Church replaced Israel in God’s plan.

“David Nekrutman, an Israeli theologian who has spent decades building bridges between Christians and Jews, responded by defending both Christian Zionism and Israeli sovereignty. Nekrutman, an Orthodox Jew who studied in Oral Roberts University’s online Graduate Theology program, emphasized that “the State of Israel is a sovereign democratic nation” with the right to “form alliances with international groups that support its security and existence” and “engage with diverse religious voices, including those outside traditional ecclesiastical hierarchies.”

“Nekrutman characterized Christian Zionism as “a historic shift toward rapprochement, moving away from ‘Replacement Theology’ (Supersessionism) and toward a deep respect for the Jewish people’s ongoing covenant with God.” He argued that Christian Zionism “helps believers rediscover the Hebraic roots of the Christian faith” rather than constituting a “damaging ideology.”

“The Catholic Church’s statement reveals what truly threatens them: losing control. For centuries, the Vatican and its hierarchies held monopolistic authority over Christianity in the Holy Land through institutional structures, property claims, and political arrangements. Christian Zionism bypasses all of that, creating direct relationships between millions of Christians worldwide and the State of Israel based on biblical interpretation rather than ecclesiastical authority.

“This represents an existential crisis for the Catholic institutional model. Christian Zionism is predominantly evangelical and Protestant, movements that already rejected Rome’s claim to exclusive spiritual authority five centuries ago during the Reformation. Now these same Protestants are reading the Hebrew Bible, connecting with the Jewish people, and supporting Israel based on their understanding of prophecy and covenant. The Catholic hierarchy’s response is to declare this biblical interpretation “damaging” and demand veto power over which Christians Israel can engage with diplomatically.

“The theological reversal is complete. Replacement theology taught that when the Jews rejected Jesus, God rejected the Jews and transferred all covenant promises to the Church. The land meant nothing, the prophecies were spiritualized, and Jewish return to Israel held no theological significance. Christian Zionism rejects every element of this framework. It reads the prophecies literally, sees the return to the Land as fulfillment of biblical promises, and understands support for Israel as a religious obligation rooted in God’s unchanging covenant with the Jewish people.

“The Catholic statement’s reference to Romans 12:5 about being “one body” weaponizes scripture to enforce institutional conformity. But as Nekrutman noted, they ignore Romans 9-11, where Paul wrestles with Israel’s place in God’s plan and warns gentile believers: “if some of the branches were broken off, and you, although a wild olive shoot, were grafted in among the others and now share in the nourishing root of the olive tree, do not be arrogant toward the branches.” The Catholic Church spent centuries being arrogant toward those branches. Christian Zionism represents Christians who finally stopped.

“The Sages teach that those who bless Israel receive blessings, and those who curse Israel receive curses. The Catholic hierarchy is positioning itself on the wrong side of that equation. They are condemning Christians whose biblical interpretation leads them to support the Jewish people’s return to their ancestral homeland. They are demanding that a sovereign Jewish state give them exclusive authority over Christian-Israel relations. They are calling the blessing of Israel a “damaging ideology.”

“Israel owes the Catholic Church nothing. The Jewish state does not require permission from Rome or its allied hierarchies to form relationships with Christians who support Jewish sovereignty in the Jewish homeland. The prophecies are being fulfilled whether the Vatican approves or not. Christian Zionists will continue standing with Israel because their Bibles tell them to, regardless of what ecclesiastical authorities declare.

“The Catholic condemnation of Christian Zionism exposes the institution’s continuing attachment to the theological framework that justified Jewish persecution for millennia. They dress it in language about “unity” and “pastoral responsibility,” but the message is clear: Christians who bless Israel threaten church authority and must be marginalized. Israel’s response should be equally clear: the days when Jewish sovereignty required Christian approval are over. The State of Israel will continue engaging with believers who bless the Jewish people, and no statement from Jerusalem’s Patriarchs will change that.”



“Is Christian Zionism a ‘harmful and damaging’ ideology?

“JONATHAN FELDSTEIN

“OPINION
“JANUARY 22, 2026

https://israel365news.com/415542/is-christian-zionism-a-harmful-and-damaging-ideology/?vgo_ee=lhCqZWbXOYGpF9sppkpTz%2FsiNlv6w7nO4D51V3YzS%2Br%2F9dXE%3AkKjhRsKvYr%2B9Y1IK1dmAGmQq%2Fr4CwKDS

“As someone deeply invested in building bridges between Jews and Christians, I’ve watched with concern the recent controversy over the term “Christian Zionism.” On January 17, 2026, the “Patriarchs and Heads of Churches in Jerusalem” issued a joint statement that has ignited a firestorm among global Christian communities. Their vague statement warned that “recent activities undertaken by local individuals” were advancing “damaging ideologies, such as Christian Zionism,” which they claimed, “mislead the public, sow confusion, and harm the unity of our flock.”

“This declaration didn’t just stop at ideology; it asserted that these activities, supported by political actors in Israel and beyond, could jeopardize the Christian presence in the Holy Land and the wider Middle East. Moreover, the patriarchs emphasized that they “alone represent the Churches and their flock” on matters of Christian religious, communal, and pastoral life, dismissing outside claims as harmful to unity.

“This statement was a direct shot across the bow at evangelical Christians who have long been steadfast allies of Israel. It’s not my place as an Orthodox Jew to get into issues that divide people who profess to be Christians, but neither do I understand why for any reason the idea of Christian Zionism should be divisive, or be singled out as the only such  “damaging ideology.”  As one close pastor friend said to me, its “Kinda hard to believe that people actually need to have that conversation… Just read the Bible people! Pretty clear that the Lord himself is a Zionist! And it’s not like it’s even inferred… It’s explicitly stated!!”

“For years, I’ve seen how Christian Zionism—rooted in a biblical understanding of God’s covenants with the Jewish people—has brought millions of Christians to stand with Israel, not out of political expediency, but from a place of scriptural conviction. It deepens the roots of their own faith. In a conversation years ago with a major Christian Zionist leader, I asked how and why he became the advocate he is.  He recounted that the day Israel was born, his father sat with him at the kitchen table, pointed to his bible and said, “This proves that every word is true.”

“Yet, here it’s being labeled as divisive, as if supporting the Jewish return to their homeland is antithetical to Christian harmony. The Patriarchs’ words echo a historical tension within Christianity, where differing theological lenses on Israel and the Jews, rooted in replacement theology, still create rifts. Supersessionism, the idea that the church has replaced Israel in God’s plan, has long clashed with restorationist views that see the modern State of Israel as fulfillment of prophecy. In Jerusalem, where Christianity’s roots run deep, such debates aren’t abstract—they affect real communities and pilgrimages.

“Enter US Ambassador to Israel Mike Huckabee, a strident evangelical leader and former governor, who didn’t hesitate to respond on X/Twitter. His statement was a measured yet passionate defense of evangelical perspectives. Huckabee wrote, “I love my brothers and sisters in Christ from traditional, liturgical churches and respect their views, but I do not feel any sect of the Christian faith should claim exclusivity in speaking for Christians worldwide or assume there is only one viewpoint regarding faith in the Holy Land.” He positioned himself within a “global and growing evangelical tradition that believes the authority of Scripture and the faithfulness of God in keeping His covenants. That includes His covenant with Abraham and the Jewish people.”

“Huckabee delved deeper into the theological heart of the matter, reminding readers that “My Christian faith is built on the foundation of Judaism and without it, Christianity would not exist. Without the Judeo-Christian worldview, there would be no Western Civilization, and without Western Civilization, there would be no America.” He rejected the notion that God could break a covenant, calling it “anathema to those of us who embrace Holy Scripture as the authority of the church.” If God could renege on His promises to the Jews, Huckabee argued, “then what hope would Christians have that He would keep His covenant with us?” This is a profound point—one that underscores why so many Christians see Israel’s existence as a testament to God’s faithfulness.

“On the term “Christian Zionism” itself, Huckabee noted it’s “too often used in a pejorative manner to disparage free-church believers, of which there are millions across the planet.” He defined a Zionist simply as someone who “accepts that the Jewish people have a right to live in their ancient, indigenous, and Biblical homeland.” For him, it’s not about endorsing a specific government or policy, but honoring “the Biblical revelation as given to Abraham, Isaac, and Jacob.” Huckabee called for unity on shared values like the sanctity of life, sacred marriage, individual autonomy, alleviating suffering, and God’s grace, urging, “Pray for the peace of Jerusalem!”

“The International Christian Embassy Jerusalem (ICEJ), a leading organization promoting Christian support for Israel, also weighed in strongly. In their response, they took issue with the patriarchs’ characterization, stating, “As Christians, we adhere to a Zionism that is purely biblical in origin, belief, scope & practice – reflecting our sincere faith convictions & not shifting political objectives.” ICEJ emphasized that “The promised restoration of Israel in modern times enjoys ample biblical credentials in both the Old & New Testaments. The Jewish return to the Land of Israel both reflects & affirms the faithful nature & character of God to always keep His sworn covenant promises, thereby strengthening the Christian faith rather than damaging or undermining it.”

“The ICEJ highlighted the historical depth of this belief, noting that “the promised Jewish return to Zion has been taught & embraced by many devout Christians throughout the Church age, from the original Apostles & some of the early Church fathers to medieval clergymen, right up to the modern-day Protestant & Evangelical church movements. Christian Zionism thus predates Supersessionism & will survive its passing.” They even cited Catholic Archbishop Cardinal Christoph Schoenborn, who supported Biblical Zionism, saying Christians should “rejoice in the Jewish return to the Land of Israel as a fulfilment of biblical prophecy.” ICEJ advocated for dialogue over public spats, chiding the Patriarchs statement that “our shared Christian Scriptures counsel that it is better to address any differences we may have about doctrine & beliefs firstly in direct dialogue among brethren, rather than through the media.”

“This controversy isn’t just theological navel-gazing; it has real-world implications. In a region fraught with conflict, Christian unity is vital. From my vantage point, as President of the Genesis 123 Foundation, I’ve witnessed how Christian Zionists have poured resources into Israel—humanitarian aid, tourism, and advocacy—strengthening ties that benefit everyone. Even more than resources, Christians worldwide support and pray for Israel based on God’s injunction: that’s God’s currency. Labeling this as “damaging” risks alienating allies at a time when antisemitism is rising globally. Perhaps the Patriarchs fear external influences diluting their authority, but true unity comes from dialogue, as both Huckabee and the ICEJ suggest.

“Evangelicals aren’t trying to supplant local churches; they’re expressing a biblically driven love for Israel, which is not only not harmful and damaging, but is Divine. As Huckabee poignantly asked, why wouldn’t every Christian be a Zionist? It’s a question that deserves prayerful consideration, not dismissal.”

For Mike Huckabee’s “X” post please click on the link at the beginning of this article.

Below here is more to the story that blows the lid off who really are the persecutors of Christians in Israel and who it should be acknowledged as the true perpetrators of Chrisitan and Jewish people not just in Israel and the Middle East but far and wide and even in your own backyard.  Jihadists and radical extremist Islam are the problem as is widely recognized even if it cannot be said for fear of upsetting someone. It is decidedly not the Evangelical Christian Zionists or the Orthodox Jews or even the secular Jews.  We all know who and what it is.


“Why We Are “Protestant” Zionists

“By JOHN ENARSON

“OPINION
“JANUARY 22, 2026

https://israel365news.com/415527/why-we-are-protestant-zionists/?vgo_ee=ecmU91GCZEpZjUXurvQ3ywpmcIK9ekQ2u3llWFQoFX8BgABy%3AeWV%2B7Jj9ZxSL7UOZa3hvuFc%2BSKirz8Os

“On January 17, the Roman Catholic Church and its allied denominations in Jerusalem released a statement condemning Christian support for Israel as a “damaging ideology” that misleads the public and harms church unity. This might look like a unified Christian front turning against the Jewish State. But for hundreds of millions of Evangelical supporters of Israel, this statement clarifies exactly why we are not just Zionists—we are Protestant Zionists.

“The Patriarchs and Heads of Churches in Jerusalem claim to be bothered by some “Christian” ideology, but the real issue is that these Protestants are helping the Jewish people retain national sovereignty in their ancient homeland. Under traditional Catholic or Eastern Orthodox theology, Jews might be tolerated as stateless minorities in Christian lands. However, the idea that the Jewish nation has a biblical right to sovereignty violates centuries of supersessionist theology—the belief that the Church has replaced Israel.

“We Evangelical supporters of Israel are “Protestant” for a reason. We “protest” against the Roman Catholic Church and the Eastern Orthodox traditions that preceded it. While modern apologists suggest the Protestant Reformation is over, the protest remains vital, whether against the worship of Mary, or images, or unbiblical soteriology. Chief among our objections is the betrayal of the Bible in favor of church tradition. The foremost meaning of “Evangelical” is to believe in the primacy of Scripture (the euangelion in old parlance).

“The Jerusalem churches’ statement does not even attempt a Scriptural argument. They rely on the old accusation that defying their theology is the “sin of disunity.” They ignore that we have compelling biblical grounds for our stance. As offensive as it may sound to the secular West or the old ecclesiastical hierarchies, we maintain that God’s Word is firmly on the side of Jewish restoration. And as Romans 3:4 reminds us, God will be found true, though every man a liar.

“This leads to the second fundamental reason for our divergence: the definition of a Christian.

“For Evangelicals, one is not a Christian merely by birth or ethnicity. The Protestant Reformation revived the biblical truth that Christianity springs from personal faith, being “born again” (John 3:3–7) to follow Jesus and submit to Scripture, regardless of heritage. As Evangelical singer Keith Green famously quipped, “Going to church doesn’t make you a Christian any more than going to McDonald’s makes you a hamburger.”

“This stands in stark contrast to the Middle East, where for centuries—surrounded by dominant Islam—to be “Christian” is effectively an ethnic minority status. Under Islamic dominance, these communities survived by behaving as subservient dhimmis. In this context, the faith often becomes a cultural collective rather than a personal conviction.

“Evangelicals understand that there are many individual true believers in the nominal churches, irrespective of cultural tradition. Moreover, we recognize that there is real persecution of nominal Christians in the Middle East. Jihadists who burn churches and behead Christians do not care if they have been born again or not. To them, even secular, hedonistic Europe is “Christian.” The jihadists exemplify sheer hatred against the cross and the Bible, and care not for any nuance. This garners Evangelical sympathy around the world. We mourn and protest this persecution.

“However, the Catholic and Orthodox hierarchies in the Holy Land attempt to weaponize this sympathy to marshal the church, including Evangelicals, against the Jewish State. They tell the world, “Israel is oppressing us.” But the reality is far more complex. The “Christians of the Holy Land” are a complex collective primarily under Jihadist—not Jewish—threat.

“Consider the anecdotal observations of Ridvan Aydemir, Eastern Orthodox Christian, online phenomenon, and expressly not a Christian Zionist. He recently came to the Holy Land to investigate the conflict for social commentary and found problems on all sides, including among traditional Christians. Ridvan was then attacked for betraying the Christians of the Holy Land. He responded bluntly:

““What Christians are you talking about? You mean those who are embroiled in gang violence over there? Who are actually active in gang violence? Who are running shady businesses in the Holy Land? Or those who are submissive to the Muslims, accepting their role as dhimmis and doing whatever the Muslims tell them because their lives are too precious to them and they just want to live in peace? … Or do you mean those who actively work for the Islamic Iranian regime and with Hamas and other terrorist organizations? Which Christians are you talking about? Or do you mean those who, for the sake of keeping the peace, do whatever Hamas tells them to do, or say whatever Hamas tells them to say, while behind the scenes telling Israel, ‘Hey, we know you’re right, we’re on your side, but we can’t just publicly [say so]?’ Do you mean those cowards? Or do you mean the good ones who actually stand up for themselves over there? Which Christians are you talking about? You have to be more specific” (Apostate Prophet, YouTube, Nov 6, 2025).

“This is the blunt mechanism of the conflict: Jihadists fight the “blasphemy” of Jewish independence in the Middle East. The international community pressure Israel to give these Jihadists self-governing control of places like Bethlehem, Ramallah, and Gaza. Here, the Jihadists mercilessly begin to persecute Christians and any moderate Muslims under their control. Meanwhile, Christian communities that remain under Israeli control go on to flourish. Using cities like Bethlehem as their base, the Jihadists continue their attacks on Jews (the Second Intifada). Israel responds by installing security measures, which cut down the suicide bombings dramatically. However, it means everyone (including Christians) from Bethlehem have to go through long security checkpoints. Muslims then use Christian dhimmis under their oppression as pawns. These churches largely do not believe what the Bible says about the Jews and Israel anyway. Thus, the historic churches of the Holy Land tell the world: Israel is oppressing us. How can Christian Zionists support the Israeli aggression against fellow Christians in the Holy Land? And if Israel does not surrender to the Jihadists, it will enrage Muslims against other Christian dhimmis throughout the Middle East. Stop the Zionists!

“History is ironic. The Church once claimed to replace the Jews, reenforcing their stateless misery. Then, Islam arose with its own supersessionist claim, forcing Middle Eastern Christians into second-class dhimmi status, denying them any sovereignty over Muslims. Now, after 2,000 years, God has kept His biblical promise and restored Jewish sovereignty, putting the lie to both theologies.

“The last major allies Israel has are several hundred million Protestant Evangelicals. The Islamist world, with the help of compliant local churches, is desperate to break this alliance. Thus, Muslim and Christian statements issue forth, labeling “Zionism” a “damaging ideology,” blaming it for everything from racism and colonialism to the common cold. But actual Zionism is simply “the belief that, like other nations, the Jewish people have a legitimate right to self-determination in their ancestral homeland.” Christian Zionism ties this belief to solid, Biblical support. Some are dispensationalist, while others are not. Thus Christian Zionists (like many Jews), not only hold this view to be the just, legal, and historically correct position, but also a modern miracle of biblical significance.

“Interestingly, by expressly blaming our faith as a “damaging ideology,” the statement is also attacking Jews and Judaism which holds the same biblical conviction. Even non-Zionist Orthodox Jews know that the Bible clearly gives the Land to the Jewish people eternally. To call this biblical view theologically unsound is not only to mock biblical logic, but to de-facto attack pious Jews as well—a position the Catholic Church has attempted to be more careful about after its failures in the Holocaust. After Vatican II, the Roman Catholic Church officially recognizes the biblical significance of Jews and Judaism. But it stopped short of acknowledging their right to the Land. This promise—which is the most oft-repeated promise in the entire Bible—is thus far denied to the Jews in Catholic theology.

“Only on the rarest occasions have Catholic leaders been willing to express any openness to the biblical position on the Land. Cardinal Christoph Schönborn came close in a 2005 address at the Hebrew University where he emphasized that Christians should recognize the Jewish connection to the Holy Land and rejoice in the return of Jews to it as a fulfillment of biblical prophecy. He also referenced Pope John Paul II’s view that the biblical commandment for Jews to live in Israel represents an everlasting covenant that remains valid today. A local Christian priest immediately protested, but to his credit, Cardinal Schönborn did not yield (Catholics for Israel, Mar 31, 2005; citing Jerusalem Post and Washington Post). However, this has never been acknowledged as any official position of the Roman Catholic Church.

“By and large, while often expressing solidarity with the Jewish diaspora, the Vatican has been one of the strongest anti-Zionist actors in the West, ever since Jewish independence. This is evident in everything from papal audiences helping rebrand arch-terrorist Yasser Arafat as a statesman, to Pope Francis holding Mass in Bethlehem in front of a massive mural of Jesus and Joseph sporting keffiyehs, helping launder the lie the “Jesus was a Palestinian.” It remains a lie. Jesus is a Jew.

“In sum, we are Protestants. We are Biblical Zionists. And we stand for justice in the Holy Land. We protest the unbiblical interpretations of the Roman Catholic Church and its allies. We hold their biblical theology of Israel and the Jews to be thoroughly lacking. We also protest the suffering of historic Christian communities under Islamist oppression. But we see through ecclesiastical statements trying to blame such hardships on the Jewish State and mislead the Evangelical world.”

And on that long playing note we say,

Am Israel Chai!

Love and Shabbat Shalom,

Rebbetzin Glenys xo